So for all presidents, we summed the changes from his first election to his last midterm. If the president’s name was on the ballot, we counted any party shifts, including those in the year he was first elected. In the second approach, we allowed for a presidential coattail effect. We scored single-term presidents for just one midterm. This meant that for two-term presidents, we summed the changes for the first midterm, the re-election, and the second midterm. This meant we ignored party shifts in the year he was first elected because at that point he had no presidential track record. In the first approach, we looked at the electoral impact of a president who was running on his record. We decided to look at how many seats for the own president's party, be it Democrat or Republican, shifted during each president's time in office. We went to the congressional records to see how this president and his party stack up compared to past administrations. We asked Dowd what he meant by modern times and he told PunditFact he was thinking of post-World War II. "But in modern times, he has lost more members of the House and more members of the Senate than any president ever has lost." "President Obama has demonstrated he’s very good at winning his own elections," Dowd said on ABC’s This Week on Dec. ![]() Bill Cassidy means Republicans will hold 54 seats in the new Senate.Īssessing the Democratic plight, one-time Republican consultant turned news analyst Matthew Dowd said President Barack Obama had overseen historic losses for his party. Mary Landrieu in the Louisiana Senate runoff. The Democrats took their final drubbing of the 2014 midterm election Dec.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |